Reflection

Reflection

Monday, August 15, 2016

The Bottom Line on Non-Profits

Recently, I needed to reference an old code to research an existing project our office did nearly 20 years ago.  Not only was it an old code (1994) but one I have never used before, the SBC, the Standard Building Code.

You see, up until about 2000, there were three major building codes in the US.  BOCA, which was prevelant in the East and Midwest.  There was the Uniform Building Code in the West, and as I said, the Standard Building Code in the Southern states.  In 1997, the International Building Code (IBC) was released as a model code that all three regional Legacy Codes (as they were called) combined to create one code for the entire country.  How that makes it “International” I am not sure.  Kind of like the World Series – all the participants are American based teams (Blue Jays being the one exception theses days).  To my knowledge, nowhere in Canada or Mexico is the IBC used…maybe they are counting Guam and Puerto Rico?  By 1999 all of the Legacy Codes ceased to exist and most states adopted the IBC. 

Just some of the books from one edition of the IBC family.
Almost immediately, this model code, one for all states, began printing separate codes for individual states and even several cities, each based on the IBC but just enough different to make you buy a new book.  And some standards groups refused to join, including NFPA or the National Fire Prevention Code.  To make it even better, many states require buildings to conform to BOTH codes.  So another set of books.  Did I mention that most of the books are rewritten every three years?  And there are about nine books needed for a full set.  And oh yes, the publishers of all these books are non-profit groups.

Some of the NFPA family of codes and standards.  They disappear into the horizon.
So to get back to the original story, I was trying to find an online resource for the 1994 code.  I merely needed to look at it for a few minutes.  I didn’t need to borrow it.  So I thought I found it, and downloaded a large PDF, only to see it was locked.  I needed a code to open it.  For that, the ICC (the Non-Profit organization that prints the International Building Code) wanted to have $75.  Imagine my frustration.  How did a 20 year old code rate 75 bucks for a Non-Profit?  Not only was the code old, the organization that created it didn't exist any longer!  I did some more searching for other sources, and I found a letter on an organization’s web page.  It came up in my search but had very little to do with the SBC Code, except for this:  Building codes and other standards are created by non-profit organizations quite often.  But they are in turn adopted into Law by the jurisdiction requiring adherence.  By definition, a law is the property of the people, and the people must be allowed access to the laws for free.  That is my non-lawyer interpretation, anyway.

They only get bigger.  Editions of the FGI (1997, 2001, 2006 & 2010 bottom to top)
2010 had to be split in 2 volumes.
It is hard for me to believe that these Non-Profits don’t rack in tons of money, much like health systems.  Reading deeper into the letter I found they published the salaries the chief executives of many of the Non-Profit organizations I see in my daily work life.  Now, I am not saying they don’t work hard.  But consider this:  each executive of these organizations makes more than the Chief Executive of the United State of America (also a non-profit entity).

Compensation of Major Nonprots Involved in Standards Setting
Rank  Name of Nonprot Organization       Name of Leader       Year   Amount
1        Underwriters' Laboratories                 K. Williams              2009   $2,075,984
2        National Sanitation Foundation          Kevin Lawlor           2009   $1,140,012
3        British Standards Institution               Howard Kerr            2010   $1,029,161
4        NFPA                                                  James Shannon      2009   $926,174
5        ANSI                                                   Saranjit Bhatia         2010   $916,107
6        ASTM International                            James Thomas         2009   $782,047
7        IEEE                                                   James Prendergast  2009   $422,412
8        Society of Automotive Engineers       David L. Schutt         2009   $422,128
9        American Soc. of Mech. Engineers    Thomas Loughlin      2009   $420,960
10      The United States of America             Barack Obama          2011   $400,000


(Source:  Public.Resource.Org Letter dated June 26, 2012 - except #10)

We, as architects, often run into issues where a building code official may require us to insert information directly from the referenced standard in our drawings.  This brings up an interesting point.  There are copyright protections written all over these standards.  What would Ms. Clouser, my high school English teacher say?  That is plagiarism.

According to the U.S. Copyright Ofce:
Edicts of government, such as judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar ofcial legal documents are not copyright-able for reasons of public policy.  (Source:  Public.Resource.Org Letter dated June 26, 2012).  This principal surely has to apply to Building Codes as each state passes legislature in order to adopt a building code, doesn’t it?  After a lawsuit against the SBC, the group Public.Resource.Org has been publishing many building codes online as PDF’s. 

So the edge is very thin.  Organizations do spend lots of money to create building codes and standards.  But they also seem to reap serious amounts of dough in book sales while maintaining a Non-Profit status along with the accompanying tax benefits. Once adopted, these codes are law, and by default, the property of the people .

Why should I pay $75 for a moldy old book?  I didn’t have to.  I finally found the actual paper copy in our office, luckily.  But virtually any law, ordinance or criminal code in my area, I can easily find online for free.  From dog leash laws to burning of leaves, I know where I stand.  But for some reason, those laws dealing with building construction and the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the human occupants within, are not readily available to the public.

Update Since the Original Creation of this Article:
Both NFPA and the ICC have since made all of their current codes, including some of the previous editions of their codes and standards, available online at their websites. They are read only, but that is all you need, especially if you're just looking for an old code for reference.  Three cheers for them!

Friday, July 22, 2016

An Architect Summer

Summertime to most families means vacations.  Some like the beach or bay. Others visit family, wherever they may be.  Our family of four (mom, dad, daughter and son) tend to seek out more varied destinations.  My wife and I started dating while studying architecture abroad.  We experienced many incredible points of interest together while we were based in Italy.  We were constantly searching out places to go, not really content to relax in one place.  There was too much to see.  After school, we tended to continue this kind of travel for our vacations.  We don’t tend to sit on the beach like some like to do.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

This summer, our idea was to take in Niagara Falls.  This destination seemed to get the kids excited.  I was excited, I had never seen it before either.  Niagara is a drivable destination for us, and we planned to go to the Canadian side which meant getting the kids passports, an idea they also appreciated a lot. 

During the trip planning, it dawned on us that we had to drive through Buffalo in order to get to the Falls, and I remembered that Buffalo has a high concentration of Frank Lloyd Wright sites.  Before you knew it, we booked an additional night in downtown Buffalo midway between two FLW houses:  The Darwin D. Martin House and Graycliff.  I didn’t know much about these buildings, and I learned from their respective websites that both houses were designed for the family of the executive who had convinced the Larkin Soap Company to hire Wright to design their headquarters in Buffalo, NY.  Obviously, we both knew about the travesty of that lost Wright gem, so it seemed like a good bet that these houses would be worth the visit.

The approach to Graycliff.  Notice the complete transparency on the lower level. 
Taking tween and teen children to historic landmark architecture is probably not the ideal family vacation for most (at least not for the kids).  Ours are kind of used to it.  But we also try to balance ‘educational’ vacations with fun for the kids.  Mom had the brilliant recall that there is a Great Wolf Lodge (and waterpark) in Niagara as well.  The fact that our time in Canada would be spent there satisfied the kids enough to endure a few hours in the two buildings.  So we set it up that we drove into Buffalo early enough to catch the last tour at Graycliff on the first day, and the following day we hit the Martin house for the first tour.  Immediately after the Martin tour, we would be on our way across the border; only a few miles away.


The look you may expect from an 11 year old visiting Wright homes while on vacation.
Graycliff has a quite striking exterior presence.  Appropriate to its name, it is a stone’s throw back from a cliff overlooking Lake Erie.  The exterior is well restored and is what you would expect from a Wright designed house.  It still needed some paint but the only real distraction is the rather ugly fence separating dumb tourists from their death in the Lake below.  Apparently, there was a really attractive wall built by Wright in the 1920’s; but the Lake has since devoured it as the cliff is now several feet closer to the house since 1920.
The inside of Graycliff is in stark contrast to the exterior.  It is currently completely ripped apart.  The foundation restoring the house is actually installing a fire suppression system, which I think is quite rare for any Wright restorations.  Plaster was missing in a large portion of the ceilings and walls, and the floors had holes large enough to see into the basement.  As there was no interior photography allowed, I don’t have any images to support these descriptions, but take my word for it.  You can imagine, the kids weren’t too impressed with the master architect’s work on the inside.  But Mom and Dad could imagine how the space was originally intended.  The house had suffered neglect and was, for many years, a home for a Catholic order of priests.  As we were walking away, we heard the docent talking to one of the restoration workers, and he said, “I’m going to be painting here for the rest of my life.”  All good architecture requires maintenance…right?

It wasn't all bad.  There's the weed covered chain link fence behind them.
It always shocks me to see a Wright house that is part of a larger neighborhood.  Pennsylvania has two Wright houses (three if you count one relocated here) and if you know about Fallingwater and Kentuck Knob, you know they’re remote and have no other neighbors but the trees, rocks and water.  There’s no lengthy, wooded approach to it. As the house was designed just after 1900, the Martin House and the cute Victorian neighbors are contemporaries of each other.  We learned the Martin House is really a complex of several buildings.  A main house, guest house, conservatory, gardener’s house and garage.  Even though this was essentially an estate, the scale of it all really fit in with the rest of the neighborhood. The only hint that there was something special going on here was the sleek, white visitor’s center.  But even this is tucked back off the street and in a scale fitting in with the rest of the context.


Martin House from the street. 
This guy's daily commute includes cutting through the yard of a Frank Lloyd Wright designed house.
The exterior here too is what you expect from a Wright House.  Though we would learn that most of the complex had suffered from serious neglect and had to be completely rebuilt, it was done well.  The interior had also suffered greatly.  Large areas of the floors failed and were rebuilt.  Many windows were replaced.  And the work was ongoing, but enough of the house was done on the first floor that even the fine detailing was able to be revealed.  As we toured the dining room, a restorer was literally gilding the horizontal mortar lines on the interior, you know, emphasizing the horizontal as Wright was want to do.  They even had some original and reproduction furniture.  And the guest house was even closer to ‘finished’, boasting a dining room set and some excellently restored built-ins. 
What zoning???  This shot demonstrates the tightness of the site.
Even though this tour was 50% longer than the Graycliff tour it was much more palatable to the kids.  Both of them enjoyed the Martin house tour: there was no, “are we done yet’s” or “I’m hungry’s”.  Mom and Dad were in our element (we both took a class which devoted a full month to Wright in Architectural Art History at Penn State).  Our kids appreciate good architecture (we dragged them through Biltmore and Monticello already), but understandably for them, a home has complete floors, walls and furnishings and ‘stuff’.  Mom and Dad were glad that the Martin House delivered.

Success!  Well, at least we avoided mutiny before getting to the water park.
When Mom and Dad take their kids to Niagara Falls for summer vacation, somehow the blog post is a thousand words on Frank Lloyd Wright.  Sounds about right to me.

This post is part of the ArchiTalks series in which Bob Borson of Life of an Architect selects a theme and a group of us (architects who also blog) all post on the same day and promote each other’s blogs. This month’s theme is "Summer"  A lot of other talented writers who also are architects are listed below and are worth checking out:

Enoch Sears - Business of Architecture (@businessofarch)
Summer is a Great Time To Market Your Architecture Firm!

Bob Borson - Life of An Architect (@bobborson)
http://www.lifeofanarchitect.com/summer-is-for-the-young-at-heart/

Lee Calisti, AIA - Think Architect (@LeeCalisti)
summer working, had me a blast

Evan Troxel - Archispeak Podcast / TRXL (@etroxel)
Lake Powell

Lora Teagarden - L² Design, LLC (@L2DesignLLC)
Seasons of Summer

Jes Stafford - MODwelling (@modarchitect)
The Dog Days of Summer

Eric T. Faulkner - Rock Talk (@wishingrockhome)
Summer -- Architecture Imagery

Michele Grace Hottel - Michele Grace Hottel, Architect (@mghottel)
/architalks-20-summer-and-architecture

Stephen Ramos - BUILDINGS ARE COOL (@sramos_BAC)
4 Secrets To Getting The Most Out Of Your Summer Internship

Michael LaValley - Evolving Architect (@archivalley)
An Acrophobic Architect's Illuminating Summer of Roofs

Sharon George - Architecture By George (@sharonraigeorge)
Glass in Architecture - Summer Wonders

Brinn Miracle - Architangent (@architangent)
4 Reasons Solar Power is a Hot Topic

Emily Grandstaff-Rice - Emily Grandstaff-Rice FAIA (@egrfaia)
Seasonal change

Jarod Hall - di'velept (@divelept)
... and the livin's easy

Drew Paul Bell - Drew Paul Bell (@DrewPaulBell)
Summer...

Samantha Raburn - The Aspiring Architect (@TheAspiringArch)
An Architectural Spark for your Summer

Kyu Young Kim - Palo Alto Design Studio (@sokokyu)
Summer in Seoul

Keith Palma - Architect's Trace (@cogitatedesign)
[Dis]Connected Summer

Adam Denais - Defragging Architecture (@DefragArch)
5 Things to Make the Most of Your Summer

Brian Paletz - The Emerging Architect (@bpaletz)
Summer Surprise

Marica McKeel - Studio MM (@ArchitectMM)
Summer : A Review

Jeffrey A Pelletier - Board & Vellum (@boardandvellum)
Do I Need to Hire an Architect?

Jared W. Smith - Architect OWL (@ArchitectOWL)
Work Projects during Summer